You rebuild your workflow from scratch every single session. That's roughly 40% of your AI time gone + the step-by-step Ultimate Codex Plugin Guide
agents
read at source ↗ natesnewsletter.substack.com
You rebuild your workflow from scratch every single session. That’s roughly 40% of your AI time gone + the step-by-step Ultimate Codex Plugin Guide
Source: Nate’s Newsletter Date: 2026-05-09 URL: https://natesnewsletter.substack.com/p/codex-plugins-bottleneck-moved
Summary
Same article as the “bottleneck moved” signal — both stubs point to the same Nate’s Newsletter post on Codex plugins. The title here foregrounds the session-reset problem: without persistent workflow context, users spend an estimated 40% of their AI time on re-setup before the agent can productively act. Codex plugins are framed as the structural answer, bundling tools, standards, and institutional knowledge into reusable, team-shareable units.
Implications
- Duplicate signal to the “bottleneck moved” stub — treat as a second citation of the same source rather than an independent data point.
- Reinforces the session continuity / persistent context thread: the cost of stateless agents is now specific enough (40% of AI time) to function as a benchmark for evaluating any workflow persistence solution.
- The framing of users acting as “the operating system” for each session is a useful lens for understanding why orchestration tooling (workflow tools, plugin systems, goals mode) is the current competitive battleground.